Search for: "State v. Levell " Results 6681 - 6700 of 29,473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2013, 11:30 am
  Simply craft (or at the appellate level suggest the crafting of) a modified rule that clearly states that whenever a trial judge is assigned for all purposes, that judge automatically turns into a master calendar judge, and acts in that capacity, if he subsequently declares herself unavailable for trial and purports to assign the parties for trial to another courtroom. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:33 pm
"  Doe also stated that he and Student B hadn't studied together, whereas Student B said otherwise.Then there are the answers to particular questions. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 11:45 am by Alexander Boni-Saenz
Alexander Boni-Saenz One of the ramifications of the recent Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm by Matthew Streb
The Supreme Court’s decision in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
It was conceded that on August 16, 1996, without a hearing, and as a result of the events which form the basis for the charges in this case, the Authority reassigned the respondent from a Level II supervisor to a Level I supervisor, with a significant cut in pay. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
The model of post-rupture economic relations is only slowly emerging, but beyond the small scale and low level consumer markets, it is likely to be dominated by state gatekeeping in the form of applications, approvals, accountability and monitoring mechanisms. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
Contrary to what Blackrock stated, the Court did not find any multiple meanings of the slogan, nor did Blackrock provide any. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:54 am by Thomas Wilson
We have also seen such cases at EU Member States level, e.g. in France, the Netherlands and Portugal. [read post]
28 May 2020, 1:27 pm by Adam Schwartz
Next Steps Moving forward, EFF will continue to advocate for enactment of broadband privacy laws, at the federal and state levels, and to defend these laws in court against poorly taken First Amendment challenges. [read post]