Search for: "State v. Roberts"
Results 6681 - 6700
of 16,758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2024, 8:59 am
In a 6-3 majority opinion written by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court rejected Chevron as inconsistent with the vision of the Founders and the imperative expressed in Marbury v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
The Supreme Court heard argument on November 7 in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
The Supreme Court heard argument on November 7 in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:14 pm
The 9th Circuit recently revived a lawsuit (Francisca Palomino Gutierrez, et al. v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
She is surely within earshot as Roberts proceeds to decisions by announcing that Justice Elena Kagan has the opinion of the Court in Henderson v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:20 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 3:05 pm
The case is District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 9:09 pm
In Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:30 am
Last year, in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:11 am
Gore and argued against California’s Prop 8 in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:03 am
The case of Johnson v Medical Defence Union has hit the Court of Appeal, with Mr Johnson still pursuing a claim for breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 in relation to the processing of his personal data in relation to his indemnity insurance policy. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:30 pm
” See Coba v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:02 am
Jones Day v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:23 am
The Supreme Court appears to be ratcheting up its investigation into the leaking of the draft opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:47 am
The reverse happens in the 10th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
In Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
Next is Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:28 pm
Casey, the 1992 case that (mostly) reaffirmed Roe v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:45 am
On Monday, in Caperton v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 8:07 am
” For Roberts, because Babcock “is not acting as a member of the National Guard of the United States all the time,” his salary as a dual technician is not a payment “wholly” for work “as” a member of that service. [read post]
