Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 6681 - 6700
of 19,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2016, 1:32 pm
” I hope justice was served. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Suk When I graduated from law school twenty years ago, as Balkinization emerged in the blogosophere, con law folks were still reeling from the Supreme Court’s latest crisis of legitimacy known as Bush v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
In support of this holding, the Court favorably quoted five Justices’ opinions in a libel case — Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
In Arnstein v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 9:47 am
The Court, in a brief opinion in Wittman v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:02 pm
The answer, I think, is no, even in light of the Supreme Court's 2004 decision in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 2:48 am
Justice Joseph Quinn's November 29, 2010 ruling in Bruni v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 4:12 pm
(The petition is No. 07-343, Kennedy v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:12 am
The Chief Justice and Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 1:30 pm
That judge, Justice Coleman, ordered that the husband pay about another $1 million to the wife and a further $500,000 for interest. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:07 am
I had that experience in the Altop v Azaz case cited in Justice Platkin’s decision, in which the court ordered a $1.2 million bond securing my client’s fair-value award, after which the respondent had to revoke his election when he was unable to obtain the bond. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 8:29 pm
Still, we should not abandon all hope. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 5:18 am
In State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:09 am
Ltd v Kintex Shareholding Company [2004] EWHC 1599 (Comm), per Cooke J at [7];(b) s.81 can be satisfied by court determination, or Tribunal decision or arbitration. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:09 am
The Simkin v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:13 pm
The district court dismissed the second complaint because it was duplicative of the still-pending-on-appeal first complaint. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 11:31 am
A few courts have so concluded (to oversimplify slightly); U.S. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:49 pm
If a client keeps refusing to provide any discovery, even after repeated court orders, and you still don't have any facts, and you still continue to prosecute the suit, that seems like that might well constitute malice to me.I'd have to know a little more about the facts to know whether that definitely transpired here. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 1:19 pm
It didn't persuade anyone on the Court of Appeal, either, and Justice Armstrong rightly affirms the trial court's denial of the motion.The only relief that Mr. [read post]
