Search for: "TRIAL COURT ADMINISTRATION" Results 6681 - 6700 of 23,833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2020, 4:10 am
RC offered no support for its argument that such motions are forbidden after trial, and the court found it "improbable" that the Board has no power to grant a motion entering a disclaimer when that is all the opposer seeks.RC contended that because Coca-Cola did not concede whether ZERO is generic or merely descriptive, Coca-Cola may apply for other ZERO marks. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 12:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit recently held that Incumaa is entitled to a trial to determine whether the corrections department's process for deciding which prisoners must stay in long-term solitary meets minimum requirements of procedural due process. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:30 am by Joy
Case'They were organized': Toronto employee speaks out after debit machine theftAuston Matthews, take notice: Ontario wants to ban celebrities and athletes in gambling adsBiden Administration Asks Supreme Court to Restore Broad Availability of Abortion PillOntario Regional Justice Paul Currie charged with assault, taken off judicial duty‘More cases will just be thrown out’: Toronto’s new courthouse hit by delays and staff shortagesU.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:45 am
As a third presidential administration takes over Guantánamo, the idea that men will be imprisoned forever without charge or trial is also at risk of becoming “normal. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:27 pm
"At common law, the criminal contempt power was confined to sanctions for contempt that interfered with the orderly administration of judicial proceedings. 4 W. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 2:13 pm by Juan Antúnez
If you make your living in and around our probate courts (or as an estate planner, doing everything possible to avoid probate), you’ll find the FY 2011-12 Probate Court Statistical Reference Guide interesting reading. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:39 am
" The holding:[W]e hold that the trial court was correct in determining that Ind. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:30 am by Robert Brammer
This was met with resistance by a Revolutionary Army hero named Colonel Thomas Butler who resisted the order to the point of facing a court martial (Wilkinson, p. 501). [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:59 pm by Miriam Seifter
”  After a bench trial, the district court found none of the challenged requirements preempted. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 10:47 am
 Docket Alarm’s expansive coverage includes state court dockets across 34 states, administrative courts and the entire federal court system via PACER. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:34 am by jonathanturley
While the recusal standard is the same for trial and appellate judges (though Supreme Court justices are not technically subject to those rules), the context for a trial judge is different. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 5:54 am by Stuart Kaplow
It was widely reported that the first green building litigation in the country was the 2007 trial court case of Southern Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:16 am
  The trial court dismissed the suit based upon the clause and the First District affirmed.On appeal, the insured argued that the choice of law/forum selection clause should be found invalid on public policy grounds. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:55 am by Greg Mersol
  As discussed below, the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District stood firm with respect to the application of Concepcion and affirmed the trial court’s decision. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:04 am by bradhendrickslawfirm
The court conducted hearings and received trial briefs on various issues surrounding James’s request to terminate J.G. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:59 pm
The trial court agreed with the Attorney General, drastically lowered the fees, and ordered Hammer and Brucker to return the excess to the estate. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 2:24 pm by John Jascob
Two thirds of the Division’s trials have been in federal court, he said, with the remainder taking place before an Administrative Law Judge.Impact of Newman. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 5:50 am by Joy Waltemath
Because the record overwhelmingly confirmed his wrongdoing and that the school district suffered prejudice, a federal court in Pennsylvania precluded him from using the documents, ordered him to return them, and stated that it would determine before trial whether to impose any additional sanctions for his misconduct and false testimony (Spencer v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 2:30 am by Florian Mueller
And under the case schedule set in April, its objections to Apple's report would be discussed at an October 10, 2013 hearing -- one month and two days before the trial date. [read post]