Search for: "AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTIONÂ "
Results 6701 - 6720
of 8,651
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2011, 5:04 pm
The question of membership is regulated by the UN Charter, the question of statehood by the principles of general international law. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 am
AT&T Mobility deals with what are uniquely American phenomena — the use of pre-dispute arbitration agreements in consumer contracts and class action processes in arbitrations. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:16 pm
This event was co-sponsored by The Jack Miller Center for Teaching American Founding Principles and History, the American Constitutional Society, The Constitution Project, DePaul University College of Law, and Ricochet. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:30 pm
In short, the Korematsu majority’s judicial passivity, in exercising an unduly deferential form of judicial review, greatly damaged constitutional principles. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:30 pm
The practice — far, far, far more common than the average American could possibly imagine — is so widespread that it even has a name: Testilying. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:59 pm
Truth, Justice and the American Way may be a standard for Superman, but it might not universally fit the bill for corporations. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 12:13 pm
The corporation could take prompt corrective action, rather than waiting until it receives a demand letter threatening a class action. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:36 am
Stipanowich, “The Third Arbitration Trilogy: Stolt-Nielsen, Rent-a-Center, Concepcion and the Future of American Arbitration,” American Review of International Arbitration (forthcoming), available here. – The Supreme Court has been making new arbitration law at a pace unparalleled since the 1980s. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:06 am
A corporation must, therefore, be responsible for the acts of its authorized agents even if particular acts were unauthorized (see Ruggles v American Cent. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
This French approach is simply antithetical to my American sensibilities. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:41 am
Yet, I suspect, for many Americans, it is shocking. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:22 pm
I think of an ideological view as one so deeply committed to a certain principle that one adheres to it in deciding how to act even when considerations of prudence overwhelmingly suggest another course of action. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:26 am
An important related question is whether public sector and private sector employees, who have different legal status under the federal constitution’s state action doctrine, should enjoy the same level of workplace privacy rights. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
Arms and the American RevolutionGun Confiscation at Lexington & ConcordGun Confiscation in BostonDeclaration of Causes of Taking Up ArmsThe Declaration by the Representatives of the United Colonies of North America, July 6, 1775Falmouth DestroyedThe Declaration of IndependenceThe Declaration of IndependenceThomas Paine on Self-Defense, Resistance, and MilitiasGun Confiscation and Smuggling ReprisedThe Militia, the Continental Army, and American MarksmanshipE. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 5:31 pm
Thomas Stipanowich of Pepperdine has written The Third Arbitration Trilogy: Stolt-Nielsen, Rent-A-Center, Concepcion and the Future of American Arbitration, American Review of International Arbitration (2012). [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 12:55 pm
If other actors will accept the action, then it can be taken. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:29 am
This novel inspired many young Americans to take up law as a profession in America. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 10:44 am
United States, federal laws ordering a state to take a specific action actually do violate the Tenth Amendment. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 6:53 am
” (Again, such self-defense actions must comply with sovereignty and other international norms, such as the requirement that the response be necessary and proportionate vis-a-vis the future threat.) [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
The court held that because those rulings undermined the key legal assumptions supporting the preliminary injunctions, the court vacated those orders, without prejudice to further proceedings applying the legal principles pronounced by the New York Court of Appeals. [read post]
