Search for: "Caming v. United States" Results 6701 - 6720 of 9,171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2011, 1:03 pm by Susan Brenner
As I’ve noted in earlier posts, § 1983 creates a civil cause of action for those deprive someone of “any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution” and laws of the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:30 am by Frances Zacher
Here in the United States, Samsung is also running into IP trouble with its Galaxy tab. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:59 pm by Josh Sturtevant
He was tried by Judge Popham who came to London specifically for the trial from his country manor Littlecote House in Hungerford, Gloucestershire. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Devin O. Pendas
Elisabeth Borgwardt has argued that the late-1940s marked a moment when the United States sought to export its “new deal vision for the world”[i] Surely it is no coincidence that—although for contingent reasons the Medical Case came first—the NMT originated in the desire to try major industrialists and bankers for their involvement with the Nazi regime. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 4:16 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Stay tuned for the Stolen Valor Act case, United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:35 pm by Steve Hall
For the third time in 16 years and the second time in two, the Orleans Parish district attorney’s office must explain itself before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:13 am by Benjamin Wittes
My old friend Alejandro Manevich, now an attorney in Toronto, writes in with the following on today’s development in the extradition case of Abdullah Khadr: I thought your readers may be interested in this morning’s order by the Supreme Court of Canada denying leave to appeal in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:00 am by John Dehn
We therefore conclude that the ATS is not limited to conduct occurring within the United States or to conduct committed by United States citizens. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:02 am by royblack
” “The reason I came here to help Dr. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:40 am by Robert Chesney
The Eleventh Circuit in yesterday’s decision – United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
Courts have similarly determined that an offender’s possession of child abuse images causes harm to the depicted children.The United States Supreme Court first acknowledged such harm in 1982 in New York v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
USPTO is IncompleteBy: Kristin Wall In March of 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Southern District of New York invalidated Myriad Genetics' patents on the BRCA1/2 genes, which predict susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. [read post]