Search for: "Head v State"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 14,743
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2024, 3:36 am
Aslan stated at an oral heading in April 2024 that he was now of the opinion that he had infringed Off-White’s trade mark rights through the importation of the counterfeit goods in 2022.The Court of Appeal of The Hague thus annulled the District Court’s judgment and declared that Mr. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
In Holler v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:31 am
United States Steel Corporation. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:48 am
It has not printed "pregnant people" since last November, in "If Roe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:44 am
That case was Federal Energy Administration v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 8:02 am
Several years ago, we discussed the decision in Weney v. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 4:58 am
Prashant Bhushan, Advocate in Mohammad Salimullah v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 1:21 am
A recent case was dealt with by the Federal Court of Australia that touched on the intersection of breach of confidentiality and copyright infringement, tackling the aforementioned separation head on.The case of TICA Default Tenancy Control Pty Ltd v Datakatch Pty Ltd dealt with the provisions of services relating to background checks for prospective tenants, conducted by TICA, showing any defaults on previous leases and other tenancy applications they might have made. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:38 am
MacNaughton v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:15 am
Ezeokoli v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:29 am
.* Innovation and its Discontents - Where are we heading? [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm
In S.P. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:48 am
The authority cited in support of this proposition is Pozzoli SPA v BDMO [2007] EWCA Civ 588, in which Jacob LJ stated at para 10: "I would add this about permission to appeal in patent cases generally. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:28 pm
How many restrictions to abortions did state politicians pass from 2011-2012 (40 years after Roe v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 4:36 am
Yet, in Humphrey v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 8:47 pm
However, two suits, Armstrong v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm
In Geiling v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:25 am
[v]Some don’t consider this the fail-safe that the government is touting it to be. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 4:36 am
Yet, in Humphrey v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 11:14 am
” Because the statements were protected opinion, the false light, Lanham Act, and state law competition claims also fail, the judge ruled. [read post]
