Search for: "I v. B" Results 6701 - 6720 of 24,601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
  Although I sympathize with the petition, I believe the Federal Circuit got the statutory interpretation correct. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 1:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch I previously wrote about the Federal Circuit’s decision in WPEM, LLC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:41 pm
This time, that interest comes via the IPKat's thoughtful friend Richard Ashmead, who writes: "I have been talking to Katharine Stephens at Bird & Bird about this case and I am attaching, with her approval, a report prepared on the French litigation by Oceane Millon de La Verteville, a French Lawyer working with B&B in London.It seems that the Tribunal de Grande Instance found the French registration valid and infringed but accepted that… [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Usual disclaimers; there were lots of overlaps where I had to make tough choices, and I favored presentations where I hadn't previously commented on drafts.Day 1 Breakout Session ITrademark Doctrine Mapping Confusion – Mark. [read post]
4 May 2007, 12:21 pm
(b) I don't at the moment understand the difference between conclusions 2 and 3.] [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:32 am by gmlevine
A respondent cannot hold for ransom a domain name without falling foul of paragraph 4(b)(i) of the Policy. [read post]