Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 6701 - 6720
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2016, 10:24 am
That makes for some nice Hollywood scripts, but the problem for real lawyers is that it doesn’t matter how well off a person, business, or government entity is, a lawyer still has to prove negligence in a courtroom. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:27 am
But we can recount the physical pieces of paper marked by the voter’s own hands; that recount doesn’t rely on any computer. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 3:52 am
Tribe is no fool, no matter what you think of academics. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 12:42 pm
curid=30522776This year marks the 50th anniversary of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution in China. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm
You can’t be uncertainty averse to both; what matters is relative salience; whether people treat those as losses v. gains, etc.Q: what about people who just decide not to take either risk? [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 11:44 am
The court explained: “But in this particular case it doesn’t much matter which agency test you might wish to employ. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 5:33 am
Geography and local custom and practice still matter, even for strong service brands. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm
In the PTO, the Examining Attorney had issued an initial refusal to register the mark on the grounds that there was a LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION between Citi’s THANKYOU mark and prior registrations. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm
Domain Name System is a logical target b/c domain names often incorporate word marks. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
[I think this is a matter of leveraging reciprocity norms; Ramsey mentions guilt.] [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
If result is thin protection for some that’s cool.McKenna: reason for excluding from © matters: if it’s b/c they aren’t original, existence of alternatives wouldn’t matter so much. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am
Doctrine is noticeably weaker in exclusion than TM and ©, but in all cases the matter isn’t excluded b/c it doesn’t meet ordinary standards for protection in ©, TM, etc. but rather b/c this matter is for utility patent: to avoid undermining utility patent supremacy.This only works if other systems have a reasonably clear and stable sense of what kinds of things belong to utility patent. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am
Talk about relative benefits of gov’t system? [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
And is it fair to say you don't know the exact value of the computer? [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:45 am
But it can’t expect taxpayers to foot the bill. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
But it can’t expect taxpayers to foot the bill. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 3:34 am
Sleet: “[t]o put the matter gently, [Delaware has] engaged in a game of ‘gotcha’ that shocks the conscience. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 3:08 pm
So don’t write down a judge’s name unless one of the specified criteria is met (e.g., the judge in question has directed you to do so, or the matter is on the docket to present an order that specific judge made previously). [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 3:08 pm
So don’t write down a judge’s name unless one of the specified criteria is met (e.g., the judge in question has directed you to do so, or the matter is on the docket to present an order that specific judge made previously). [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
As a consequence, this was a subject matter that was innately interest- ing to me and an industry sector that I was familiar with. [read post]
