Search for: "People v Word"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 17,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2009, 3:36 pm
Lakewind Church: man who fell when "taken by the spirit" sues his church for failing to properly supervise the people he thought would catch him Goodman v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 10:00 pm
The case is blank">Connection Distributing Co., et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:42 am
Recently, the 9th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) in the case of In re Smith (Smith v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 6:36 pm
One time the man came into the office for one reason or another, and word quickly spread that he was in the building. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 1:14 pm
The "legitimacy dichotomy" holds that, when adjudicating constitutional disputes, judges either obey the sovereign people’s determinate constitutional instructions or illegitimately trump the sovereign people’s value judgments with their own. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:28 am
Image via Wikipedia Lately, I have noticed younger people (than I) touting shirts with the word freedom spelled “freedumb. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 3:32 pm
” (People v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 11:23 am
If you don't believe me, read the final act of Henry V. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:30 am
In other words, devolving the taxing power to the states. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 11:30 am
I blogged last week about the Supreme Court's pending cert petition in Van Buren v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:49 am
" LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:59 am
In Jones v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:40 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
The question centers, as it has for centuries, on the use of the criminal law to embed social conventions into the sexual relations of people. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 3:54 am
Is sexual orientation, or do we take claimants’ word? [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:04 am
Today, we have controversy over whether or not to fly some people at taxpayer’s expense to funerals (here vs here and here). [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am
Indeed, in 1983 the Taoiseach Garrett Fitzgerald, made an eve of the poll address to the people in which he said that the wording he had proposed placing in the constitution was so ambiguous that he could no longer ask the electorate to support it. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 9:31 am
When last I wrote about it, the latest word was an Eleventh Circuit case In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena (US v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:06 am
He provided a one-word response, "O'Brien. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 7:45 am
Nguyen v. [read post]
