Search for: "Post v. State"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 99,658
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2023, 4:37 pm
On August 21, 2023, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Raines v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 2:50 pm
From Tomlinson v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 2:16 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
From today's California Court of Appeal opinion in Iloh v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm
Stickman IV's opinion in Doe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:44 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:35 am
This post is by Carlos Manuel Vázquez, a professor of law at Georgetown Law School. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:30 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
In the August 23, 2023 opinion in Moore v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
From Hakim v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:55 am
This is significant in two broad sets of cases: those that rely on history to apply a constitutional rule (as lower courts are doing with the historical-analogical test prescribed by New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:23 am
And then, in 2017, the famous hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:37 am
The post St. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:37 am
The post St. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:35 am
Miller v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:21 am
Nautica Apparel, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
How Jack Smith May Charge Trump PAC with Fraudulent Fundraising Within the Bounds of First Amendment
24 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am
Code of Civil Procedure section 2094 states as follows: (a) An oath, affirmation, or declaration in an action or a proceeding, may be administered by obtaining an affirmative response to one of the following questions: (1) “Do you solemnly state that the evidence you shall give in this issue (or matter) shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? [read post]
