Search for: "Price v Price"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 18,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm
If the parties cannot agree the price to be paid for the purchase of the freehold, Sch. 6, 1993 Act sets out the basis upon which the LVT can determine the same. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:34 pm
In a recent decision, Birchfield v. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 9:18 am
In another update to the preliminary injunction issued August 29 in the Apotex case, The Fire of Genius writes that there are two interesting things to note about Judge Stein's decision: (1) it nowhere mentions the eBay v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 3:04 pm
In C.R.T.R. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:56 am
Here are the materials in Northern Arapaho Tribe v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 12:14 pm
The case is entitled Hollins v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:24 am
The US Supreme Court today decided in Bilski et al. v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:54 pm
Amgen v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:21 pm
The 7th Circuit today issues a combined opinion for three cases, including Darrell Bruce v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 10:34 am
A recent Ninth Circuit decision, Loos v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:06 pm
What follows is an excerpt from Blackshear v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm
The Court of Appeals of the Seventh Circuit of the state of Illinois has affirmed a judgment in Estate of Stanley Cora v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 9:18 am
In Proton Energy Group SA v Orlen Lietuva [2013] EWHC 2872 (Comm), the court was required to decide whether a binding contract had been agreed between the parties. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:02 pm
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in National Pork Producers Council v Karen Ross on Oct. 11. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:41 am
Housing Auth. v Dugan, 261 AD2d 406Typically when a position is abolished and this results in the layoff of a permanent employee, his or her name is placed on a preferred list in accordance with the provisions of Civil Service Law Section 80 [permanent employees in the competitive class] or Section 80-a [permanent employees in the noncompetitive class]. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:54 pm
Amgen v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:03 am
Damages are likely to be the preferred option where an infringer has, for example, eroded the market share of the rights-holder by undercutting on price, such that the losses of the plaintiff exceed the profits made by the infringer for the same sales. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 5:10 pm
See Charles Schwab Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:51 am
The IPKat has now had some time to put its razor-sharp fangs into the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
