Search for: "R. B." Results 6701 - 6720 of 55,746
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2019, 8:48 am by Eugene Volokh
Engaged in conduct that evidences a lack of ability or fitness to discharge the duty owed by the licensee to a client or the general public; or "B. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 6:26 am by Astarita
In our view, that is so even if the disseminator did not ‘make’ the statements and consequently falls outside subsection (b) of the Rule. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 5:41 am
Contents include:Part I Treaty of Rome 60 yearsJános Martonyi, Differentation or Disintegration Miklós Király, From the Treaty of Rome to the Rome Declaration – Scenarios for the European Union’s Future Gyula Bándi, The Route of Environmental Regulation in European Integration with Examples Csaba Törő, The Main Distinguishing Characters of the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy in the EU Law and Institutional System… [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:28 am by Louise Thorning Ahle
On the surface, the dependency on the basic application/registration seems to be a quick fix for holders of earlier rights since, according to WIPO’s Guide to the International Registration of Marks, Part B (the “WIPO Guide”), § 83.02, this dependency is absolute, and is effective regardless of the reasons why the basic application is rejected or is withdrawn or the basic registration ceases to enjoy, in whole or in part, legal protection. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 10:55 am by Ted Max
Commencing on January 1, 2020, Section 653o(b)(1) shall make it “unlawful to import into this state for commercial purposes, to possess with an intent to sell, or to sell within the state, the dead body, or any part or product thereof, of a crocodile or alligator. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 10:55 am by Ted Max
Commencing on January 1, 2020, Section 653o(b)(1) shall make it “unlawful to import into this state for commercial purposes, to possess with an intent to sell, or to sell within the state, the dead body, or any part or product thereof, of a crocodile or alligator. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:33 am by Greg Mersol
Because there were both equitable and legal claims, the court certified the case under both 23(b)(2) (equitable relief) and 23(b)(3). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:23 am by Eugene Volokh
(a) & (b) [courts may grant writ of administrative mandamus where a "final administrative … decision" was not the product of "a fair trial"]; Doe v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:30 am by nmlandon
The Haifa Center for German & European Studies (HCFES), a joint project of the University of Haida and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), and the Heinrich Böll Foundation Israel present the Decarbonization Strategies in Germany and Israel Conference on Thursday, Nobember 7, 2019 at the University of Haifa. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:06 am by José Guillermo
El Legislativo puede citar, interpelar y censurar a los ministros y el Ejecutivo, básicamente, interponer su Cuestión de Confianza (CdeC) cuando necesita que el Legislativo apruebe cualquier ley o política que requiera para la gobernabilidad. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 10:01 pm by Doug Austin
 »   Related StoriesDOS and DON’TS of a 30(b)(6) Witness Deposition, Part SixIssuing the Hold is Just the Beginning: eDiscovery Throwback ThursdaysDOS and DON’TS of a 30(b)(6) Witness Deposition, Part Five  [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Court then used the factors from R. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
(b) On 21st April 2017 he again visited with a colleague but did not enter the premises, but left questionnaires to be completed by the occupiers with a view to obtaining information regarding the house and whether it was an HMO. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:15 am by Steve Brachmann
The USPTO is seeking a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal for failure to state a claim, arguing that application flags under the SAWS program don’t concern individual patent applicants and that omission of those flags from patent application files isn’t the... [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 8:00 am by Giles Peaker
In such a case as this, there was no need to reliance on CPR 52.21(3)(b) – that there was “a serious procedural or other irregularity in the proceedings”. [read post]