Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 29,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 8:56 am
The decision in Agency for International Development v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 5:01 am
To be struck down, the law must violate a provision of the applicable Federal or state Constitution.A recent example of this principle showed up in Fite v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
Today is the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court's devastating decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 6:54 am
It does so again in this case.The case is Egbert v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 8:44 am
As it happened, I taught Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 6:30 am
Common law damages suits against federal officers are said to have remained routinely available until after Bivens was decided when, in the 1988 Westfall Act, Congress barred state-law tort suits against federal officers acting within the scope of their employment.Through case studies of litigation against federal officers involved in customs enforcement and maritime seizures, this Essay qualifies and revises these claims. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:45 am
When the Court issued yesterday’s decision in Fisher v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:33 pm
In Koricic v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
”); Brown v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:20 am
As with the plan invalidated in Biden v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 6:27 am
In Yaman v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 10:22 am
Friday 18 November United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
Holder (Granted )Docket: 10-545Issue(s): (1) Does the Progress Clause of the United States Constitution, Article I, § 8, cl. 8, prohibit Congress from taking works out of the public domain? [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 2:10 pm
The legislative history of Section 230 refers specifically to a New York state case — Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
While this was implemented to make insurance widely affordable by spreading the cost, those who oppose the Act state that this provision is unconstitutional in that Congress is obliging people to purchase a product from a private company. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
--City of East Lake v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:00 am
On the interpretive front, the canonical Supreme Court rendering of the executive branch’s interpretive discretion is found in Chevron v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:03 pm
United States --Notes and Questions --Morrison v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:02 pm
Wrote Chief Judge Mary Beck Briscoe for the unanimous three-judge panel in Golan v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:51 am
Longs v. [read post]
