Search for: "State v. Minor" Results 6701 - 6720 of 16,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2023, 2:30 am by Felix Mikolasch
In line with its previous findings that damage is required for compensation, the Court states that a person affected needs to prove non-material damage (para. 50). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
They argued that their songs contained “clear and strongly worded political messages critical of the government and expressing support for feminism, the rights of minorities and the ongoing political protests”. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:34 am by Brian Raum
The majority explains that the case: “[D]oes not involve minors. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
If it isn’t, then how on earth can the UK contend that domestic law ever complies with the procedural safeguards required in McCann v UK and Cosic v Croatia? [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 23 and Thursday 24 June, the Supreme Court will hear the conjoined cases of R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited). [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 10:11 am by Eugene Volokh
Perhaps this question should be left entirely to state courts and state legislatures instead. [read post]