Search for: "State v. Roberts"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 16,758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2019, 6:20 am
It was a far cry from the census case or deep disagreement about proper methods of capital punishment, but the justices heard oral argument yesterday afternoon in Taggart v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:26 pm
Supreme Court decided (5-4) 14 Penn Plaza v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:25 pm
ShareIn Borden v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 9:46 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:44 am
At the second evidentiary hearing, defense expert Robert Young testified that JH's laptop would not have automatically connected to Belkin54G the first time she lost her signal. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:55 pm
In Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am
United States, Merit Management Group v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
The Fredericksburg Care Company LP v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Dorf, a Justia columnist, is the Robert S. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:34 am
In Hernandez v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm
By: Robert S. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:49 pm
In State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am
United States. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 3:43 am
United States “retroactive by way of one of the extraordinary writs it has the power to issue. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:45 am
In an op-ed for The Legal Intelligencer (subscription or registration required), Charles Kelbley looks back at the recent oral argument in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:36 am
While the majority decision, written by Chief Justice Roberts, does not specifically state this, Justice Thomas writes in a concurring opinion that “Grutter is, for all intents and purposes, overruled. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am
This blog’s Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 11:24 am
Ultimately, the majority, heralded by Justice Roberts, found the Act constitutional under this Congressional power. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:35 am
The early software cases, such as Gottschalk v. [read post]