Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 6701 - 6720 of 57,125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2010, 6:19 am by Jeff Gamso
  Here's the basic rule, taken from State ex rel Healey v. [read post]
  Williams v The London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37 was about the opposite scenario; where a local authority wanted to accommodate but the parents wanted the children back. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
And further dispute arose between Sheeran's song 'Photograph' (also written by the first and third claimants; Sheeran and McDaid) and a song called 'Amazing', following which there was a settlement agreement and 35% of the PRS royalties now go to the writers of 'Amazing'.Naturally, the Claimants sought to strike out these allegations, which came before Deputy Master Jefferis on 4 June 2019 on the basis that similar fact evidence is only admissible in civil… [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 2:21 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The New York Court of Appeals has held that a housing complex that threatened litigation against a "tester" organization that accused it of housing discrimination can be liable under the state law that prohibits retaliation for asserting discrimination claims.The case is Clifton Park Apartments v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 12:34 pm by jmehalik
School of Law – Indianapolis Dean Gary Roberts, they also both said it was possible that states would address the issue on their own. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 1:01 pm by WIMS
Because ICCTA 'preempts all state laws that may reasonably be said to have the effect of managing or governing rail transportation,' N.Y. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:51 am
The United States Supreme Court recently said it would consider whether Costco Wholesale Corp. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal arguably side-stepped the issue, noting that Mitting J had said he “merely used the dictionary definitions as a check, and no more” and that “no harm was done”. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:55 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix
   They stated (in Fraser (Nat Gordon) v HM Advocate (No. 2) [2009] HCJAC 27 at paragraph 13 that: “[W]e have come to the conclusion that the appellant’s application for leave to appeal to the Privy Council should be refused as incompetent. [read post]