Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 6701 - 6720 of 16,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2023, 1:20 am by Giesela Ruehl
On the other hand, an increasingly strong influence of the assertion of European values can be observed. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am by INFORRM
  “If commercial information, but not personal, information is within section 72, then the applicability of the section could, in some cases, turn on how the claim is pleaded – a most unattractive result“. [52] In relation to the problem of “mixed messages” – ones which contain some confidential information and some non-confidential information – Lord Neuberger was of the view that there was a “strong presumption that at least some of the… [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:50 pm by Ilya Somin
The State not only urges us to answer that question in the negative, but it also requests that we wholly abandon the proportionality framework from State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 11:30 am by Isabel McArdle
Balogun v UK [2012] ECHR 614 - Read judgment It has been a week of victories for the UK government in deportation cases in the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 3:54 pm
The Los Angeles Times reported on June 19, 2008, that the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Quon v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:54 am by Heidi Henson
A federal district court in South Carolina has invalidated the NLRB's rule requiring employers to post notice in the workplace informing employees of their NLRA rights (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, April 13, 2012, Norton, D). [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The first is that more banks failed in Georgia than any other state, so the Eleventh’s Circuit’s ruling will be determinative in connection with the largest state grouping of cases. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:30 am by Big Tent Democrat
Josh Marshall writes: If you read about how the federal constitution came about, one thing is crystal clear: it was devised by people who wanted to create a strong federal government and saw the states as obstacles to doing so. [read post]