Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 16,215
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2016, 11:11 pm
Smith and 2006’s State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 11:11 pm
Smith and 2006’s State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:21 pm
The petition of the day is: Lee v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 5:10 pm
If (God forbid) there were a Bush-v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:47 am
Reversing summary judgment against the employee’s breach of contract claims, the court found that ambiguities in the contracts created genuine factual issues, but it affirmed summary judgment on the remaining issues (Hackney v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:54 am
That is the question before the justices on Wednesday morning, in Lynch v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 9:24 am
She has experience in government, and her service won kudos from her political opponents for the seriousness and care in which she went about her roles as senator and secretary of state. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 8:48 am
A judge in New York City declines to do, and the law remains on the books.The case is Silberberg v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm
Consider the recent case of Hurst v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
United States, 961 F.2d 17, 20-22 (1st Cir. 1992); United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 2:24 pm
In Buchanan v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 11:54 am
He is a convicted sex offender listed on the state's registry and was also convicted of a 1987 kidnapping in Arizona. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:20 pm
Hawkes Decision In United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:27 am
In the case of DiCarlo v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:40 am
Smith v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:03 pm
McLaughlin v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 7:51 am
Michaels v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:54 am
The government’s opposition to Fannie Mae’s position should help Lightfoot considerably, because it suggests at a minimum the lack of a strong federal interest in protecting Fannie Mae from state-court litigation. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 7:30 am
China’s rapid land reclamation and construction in the Spratlys and the July award issued by the UNCLOS tribunal in the Philippines v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 1:03 pm
Political implications aside, this development raises many of the thorny Fourth Amendment questions about digital searches and seizures that I addressed in this post a few weeks ago following the Second Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
