Search for: "U.S. v. Michael"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 6,865
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
An off-duty U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
She discussed the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
A simple hypothetical drawn from the facts in San Antonio v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:27 pm
Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
Barker v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
: A CHALLENGE FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY / ANICEE VAN ENGELAND New York: Oxford University Press, c2011 KZ6515 .E54 2011 See Catalog Commerce -- Periodicals INSIDE U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
: A CHALLENGE FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY / ANICEE VAN ENGELAND New York: Oxford University Press, c2011 KZ6515 .E54 2011 See Catalog Commerce -- Periodicals INSIDE U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
Increasingly, influential legal commentators, such as Sanford Levinson and Michael Seidman, place a large part of the blame on the Constitution. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 8:17 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2019)The Coalition for Peace and Ethics BHR Treaty Project is considering Draft of the "Legally Binding Instrument to Regulate, in International Human Rights Law, The Activities Corporations and Other Business Enterprises," released on 16 July 2019 by the open-ended intergovernmental working group (OEIGWG) Chairmanship. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
The word is rich with meaning, meaning that shifts subtly over the long arc of its engagement with the cultures that have used the word as the sign toward which meaning (and metaphor) could be attached.impeach (v.)formerly also empeach, late 14c., empechen, "to impede, hinder, prevent;" early 15c., "cause to be stuck, run (a ship) aground," also "prevent (from doing something)," from Anglo-French empecher, Old French empeechier "to hinder,… [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:13 am
As Quinta and I explained: Under United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:30 am
In June, a gunman slaughtered 49 people in Orlando, Florida, pledging allegiance to the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) in the process. [read post]
