Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 6701 - 6720 of 16,271
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2015, 1:51 pm by Gene Quinn
Several weeks ago, in a per curiam decision with only Judge Newman dissenting, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied the Sequenom petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Senior District Court Judge begins the opinion by explaining that the “Government seeks a $14 million forfeiture money judgment against defendant Qendrim Dobruna in the criminal case of United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
The following is a short review of the amicus briefs that have been filed in the case.[3] United States Government When the United States government files and amicus brief, that brief is usually seen as the most important amicus brief in the case. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 2:15 pm by Jamie Williams
The United States Court of Appeal for the Seventh Circuit today struck down an overbroad permanent injunction against online speech issued by a lower court in a defamation case. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
United States “retroactive by way of one of the extraordinary writs it has the power to issue. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on this week’s summary reversal of the Sixth Circuit in the habeas case White v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm by Sarah Freuden, Alex Zerden
The ATS is an eighteenth century law that permits foreign plaintiffs to bring suit in federal court for torts “committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:26 am
United States, 703 F.3d 149 (2d Cir. 2012), precedent, that forum will be in the Second Circuit, probably in New York City.This First Amendment process doesn't change the off-label warning impossibility argument that we've discussed, because not only is prior FDA review still required, but also a prior (perhaps lengthy) litigation process before any change to labeling (or promotion) can legally occur.We’ll be watching for the next case. [read post]