Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS "
Results 6721 - 6740
of 95,168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2019, 4:53 am
(But given the existence of these clauses in the first place, that's probably something they should have been thinking about all along.) [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:44 am
Conflicts counsel may be provided with any and all (unredacted) filings on the docket. . . . [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:15 am
[Defendant] asserted many more defenses through the summary judgment exercise, causing [plaintiff] to expend its resources on responding to such motions, all of which were denied. . . . [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 3:02 pm
On motions and cross-motions by all defendants for summary judgment, the trial court denied the motions and Dr. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:49 am
"Plaintiff complains about [the expert's] conclusion that, because [a technology transfer company] offered to sell the [patent-in-suit] to [a third party] for $100 million in December 2011 and to license the patent for $70 million in March 2012, the $30 million difference means the value of [the patent] to all other potential licensees cannot be more than 30% of the value of the patent. . . . [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 10:18 am
-- awarding attorney's fees and costs to plaintiff, but reducing requested amount for fees incurred prior to litigation, excessive time drafting the complaint; and block billing.Summaries of all opinions issued since April 2015 available here. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 8:46 pm
Summaries of all opinions issued since April 2015 available here. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:24 pm
In those instances in which process has not been served upon a defendant, all subsequent proceedings will be rendered null and void. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
In allowing the Plaintiff's expert's opinion to remain in the case, the court found that issues of material fact precluded the entry of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant.The court ruled that, where a Plaintiff’s expert ruled out all other potential causes of a house fire and determined that there were two potential causes, both of which would have been the result of an alleged manufacturing defect, that expert was not required to show which… [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Harford County, Maryland, (D MD, Sept. 23, 2019), a Maryland federal district court refused to grant summary judgment to either side on almost all the claims by a Muslim group seeking permits to construct a community center. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:26 am
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:15 am
”Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
27 May 2018, 7:15 pm
.) -- denying plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees and costs in case involving the Federal Coal Program after finding that Office of Secretary and BLM "had begun processing the plaintiff’s request well before this lawsuit was initiated and that both agencies had even made partial releases to the plaintiff before the complaint was filed. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 9:22 am
Summaries of all opinions issued since April 2015 available here. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 8:10 pm
Putative Class Action Against American Airlines Asserting Claims under Montreal Convention based on Flight Delays caused by Weather Dismissed without Leave to Amend because Two Year Limitations Period Expired Texas Federal Court Holds On December 17, 2009, plaintiff filed a putative class action against American Airlines for alleged violations of the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air (“Montreal Convention”), which “provides… [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 7:07 am
The court granted in part plaintiff's motion to compel further damages discovery. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:27 am
That's why the Ninth Circuit affirms the dismissal of plaintiff's lawsuit, and why all the other circuits to address the issue have gone the exact same way.I'll nonetheless note for the record that this statutory breadth seems profoundly unjust. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 7:08 am
"[T]he principal factor weighing in favor of staying this action is that the USPTO has now rejected all claims of the [patent-in-suit] as obvious not once, but twice. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 7:15 am
The court granted in part defendant's motion for attorneys' fees under its inherent power because plaintiff's litigation was in bad faith and rejected plaintiff's argument that defense counsel frontloaded their work. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:21 am
The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment that it did not willfully infringe plaintiff's patent because, on interlocutory appeal, a dissenting Federal Circuit judge opined that plaintiff's patent was invalid. [read post]
