Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 8,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
A superior court judge in San Francisco recently ordered CDCR to comply. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:09 am
It is axiomatic that counsel "may not shift to the client the legal responsibility it was specifically hired to undertake because of its superior knowledge" (Hart v Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo, 211 AD2d 617, 619 [1995]). [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 2:57 pm
In so holding, the court disapproved the Court of Appeal's decision in McCoy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:55 am
The contractor’s arguments were shut down by Labor & Industries, then an Administrative Law Judge and the Superior Court. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
The federal courts put a stop to this.The case is Mullins v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:04 am
Does such a directive constitute unlawful discrimination on the grounds that the employer has a perception that the employee has a disability? [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:00 am
An individual’s location, standing alone, does not provide sufficient grounds for a search, pursuant to Terry v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
A Santa Clara County Superior Court jury convicted Mr. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 2:25 pm
He put strongly before the Court his superior financial contributions, the esteem in which his services were held and the approbation of his business associates and others in his industry and decision making. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 6:59 am
During oral argument on Monday in Wall v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
Id. at 228 (“This court has determined that the rule against admitting evidence of subsequent remedial measures does not apply to actions based on strict liability”). [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 5:02 am
Does she have a case? [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:42 am
” The court said the penalty imposed did not “shock its sense of fairness,” and sustained the commissioner’s determination.* See Von Essen v NYC Civil Service Commission, 3 A.D.3d 115 and Von Essen v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:23 pm
Ivy Press v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:58 pm
Superior Court, 93 CAL. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:56 am
”The court said that the penalty of dismissal does not shock its sense of fairness citing the Pell doctrine [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222].NYPPL [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:02 am
McGraw v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:46 pm
Commissioner v. [read post]
