Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 15,522
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2015, 1:56 pm
Now, Batman can continue fighting crime, knowing that no one can steal his ride (at least figuratively, without paying . . . ). [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 1:56 pm
Now, Batman can continue fighting crime, knowing that no one can steal his ride (at least figuratively, without paying . . . ). [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:00 am
Sept. 15, 2015); Acevedo v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:36 am
Roosevelt, in examining the history of the Japanese internment camps and laying bare the government’s advocacy and the Court’s decision-making in Korematsu v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:29 am
By Dennis Crouch Nordock v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:38 am
Was this a joke of the sort that Wild Bill Douglas made when he wrote Brady v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:30 am
v=DVLVZ-ODYRY. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:30 am
v=DVLVZ-ODYRY. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm
Problems of defining a favored use—descriptive use test has to figure out whether the use is descriptive; we could look at intent, but that doesn’t fit TM policy well; we could look at consumer understanding, but then the meaning of a use is contextual and must be assessed by reference to the market. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 12:50 pm
Autogiro v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 9:16 am
Philips v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am
Garcia v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm
The acquiring party is better equipped to figure out what’s going on than an individual author. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:17 pm
But Chiang’s message is about the language of orphan v. troll. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
In Hoffman v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
In Hoffman v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:31 am
Distinguish notice of existence v. notice of scope. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 8:51 am
Go figure. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:52 am
That figure is nearly equal to plaintiffs’ estimated compensatory damages in the case (approximately $1.6M). [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 6:46 am
But this sort of isolated, non-sexually-themed, and not highly vulgar figurative usage is unlikely to qualify as “indecent. [read post]
