Search for: "In re Richard A" Results 6721 - 6740 of 10,346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2010, 4:41 am by James Morphy, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP,
This post is based on a Sullivan & Cromwell client memorandum by François Barrière, Gauthier Blanluet, Dominique Bompoint, Gérard Mazet, Richard Vilanova and Olivier de Vilmorin. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
You're a malpractice case waiting to happen" is drummed into your head from day one wherever you go to school. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 10:36 am
" According to James Cox, a professor of law at Duke University, "If we're serious about protecting investors and consumers, we have to understand it's individuals not entities who commit violations and should be hung out to dry. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:18 pm by justia
Richard Kulerski Esq., 810 points, 19 answers Robert James Reynolds, 525 points, 11 answers Mr. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:39 am by William Carleton
Senator Richard Shelby, the ranking member, asks Ms. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 9:30 am by azatty
In two recent instances, there have been cases where people are “listening” to what you’re saying online in a way that can only be deemed invasive. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 7:20 am
More significantly, the legislation would eliminate restrictions that currently bar legal aid attorneys from filing class action law suits, collecting attorneys' fees, engaging in legislative advocacy and representing certain types of clients such as prisoners on re-entry issues. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:42 pm
The existence of last week's ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR, Jacob LJ and Richards LJ) in Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited v Eli Lilly and Company Limited [2009] EWCA Civ 1362 has already been noted on this weblog, but not much has been said about its substance. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 9:58 am by Frank Pasquale
They will, of course, insist that such information is proprietary–that is, they own it, and they’re not giving it up. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 6:53 pm
Virgin Group Chairman Richard Branson will judge the Canadian contest. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 5:31 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
"If You're Arguing That Someone 'Deserves' Copyright, Your Argument Is Wrong" http://j.mp/esC0Rp #lwb486 interesting new proposal ... [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:35 am by Steve Hall
Government has to look at everything we're doing. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 7:13 am
They are serving an important role as activists and catalysts but they’re not trying to build a coalition to actually govern. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:10 am by Lovechilde
"Two weeks ago the head of the American Petroleum Institute promised 'huge political consequences' if Obama didn't do what they wanted, and now they're trying to make good on the threat. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Should he be making home videos about what a good time he is having, as Richard Speck did, or chatting on his smuggled cell phone, as Charles Manson does? [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
” More reporting comes from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, in an expanded version of a story that Dan included yesterday, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed, Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Bill Mears of CNN, Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST, and Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At Prawfsblawg, Richard Re looks at ”the history of the judicial oath’s “equal right” principle, including its role in recent confirmation hearings,” and offers three questions senators could ask Gorsuch to “prompt public reflection on legal issues regarding economic equality” and “help the public understand what Justice Gorsuch would mean when he promises to do ‘equal right to the poor. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am by Amy Howe
  Jess Bravin covered that argument for The Wall Street Journal, with commentary coming from Richard Re and Carissa Hessick at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]