Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 7,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2010, 6:25 am
While Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:49 am
Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am
ACSblog highlights a recent American Constitution Society issue brief on state laws that bar people with criminal records from voting, in light of the Court’s recent call for the views of the Solicitor General in Simmons v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:40 am
Circuit decided Lamprecht v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
Anthony Kennedy’s term would have ended in 2011 rather than 2018, before he wrote opinions such as United States v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:54 pm
Most famously, perhaps, the Court did that four years ago in a death penalty case – Kennedy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 5:30 am
See Moody v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 10:32 am
United States Department of Justice, 491 U.S. 440, 470 (1989)(Kennedy, concurring)(“[w]here the language of a statute is clear in its application, the normal rule is that we are bound by it”) http://bit.ly/14E67gv. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm
We found the worst law-school discrimination we ever saw at Arizona State, also post-Grutter. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 10:32 am
United States Department of Justice, 491 U.S. 440, 470 (1989)(Kennedy, concurring)(“[w]here the language of a statute is clear in its application, the normal rule is that we are bound by it”) http://bit.ly/14E67gv. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:05 pm
In McBurney v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 10:34 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:25 am
" (Ettinger v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Federal Election Commission or Schuette v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:51 am
Last week, in Dixon v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 9:06 pm
Justice Kennedy's Boumediene opinion states: "The Court has been careful not to foreclose the possibility that the protections of the Suspension Clause have expanded along with post-1789 developments that define the present scope of the writ. [read post]
