Search for: "Legall v. State"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 88,738
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
As the Court explained in Masson v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:27 pm
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm
In Lyng v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:20 pm
In Clayton v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:48 pm
As Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 1:02 pm
There is a serious side to this case – Ohio is, after all, the state whose right of publicity laws produced Zacchini v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 12:00 pm
Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 11:55 am
In a recently filed case, Andersen v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 11:07 am
State v Family Bank of Hallandale, 667 So2d 257 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) is a case that can be used to show subsequent servicer liability: The law is well established that an unqualified assignment transfers to the assignee all the interests and rights of the assignor in and to the thing assigned. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 11:06 am
PRC Race Suit According to EEOC’s complaint in EEOC v PRC Industries, Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:28 am
Flores v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:00 am
In Dep't of Homeland Security v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
Upon passage of a simple resolution or receipt of a letter, the State Department must provide the requested report within 30 days. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
Yet that doesn't seem likely to me; and it seems to me that the company ought to have to show that, rather than to have the legal system assume that such a remedy is impossible. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:50 am
The most famous decision might be the UK Supreme Court’s Ruling in Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd, which was reported on this blog here. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 11:00 pm
”Given those discrepancies, the appellate court concluded that Corrections lacked a bonafide basis to withhold the requested footage and remitted the matter to the Albany County Supreme Court for a determination as to the fees and costs awardable to PLS, given its prevailing party status here.Looks like that FOIL foolishness got flogged.# # #Matter of Prisoners' Legal Servs. of N.Y. v New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
This summary must include (i) the person or persons affected; (ii) the date the incident was discovered and whether it is ongoing; (iii) whether any data was stolen, altered, accessed or used for any unauthorized purpose; (iv) the effect of the incident on the entity’s operations; and (v) whether the incident has been remediated or is currently being remediated. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 4:59 pm
V. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:41 pm
United States (courtesy of Pacific Legal Foundation). [read post]
