Search for: "Lively v. State"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 29,024
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2009, 11:23 am
This stands in sharp contrast to both the district court judge -- Judge Miller -- and the undersigned, who lives within (figurative) spitting distance of the area in question. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 9:13 am
The Supreme Court on Friday wiped out a lower court ruling that gave the President the authority to detain indefinitely as terrorism suspects individuals who are living legally in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 8:45 pm
In Lawrence v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
Neugebauer stated: the hypothesis that the scientific community is using is that toxic compounds released into the environment by the two Staten Island landfills have caused and are causing an increased rate of cancer and other illnesses among residents living in proximity thereto. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:46 pm
See Snell v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:44 am
Since the Brussels I Regulation (Council Regulation 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters) permitted an individual to bring a direct action against the insurer in the member state of his domicile, it followed that the insurer must submit to the procedural rules of the member state in which it was sued. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:46 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Bohomme v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:21 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
These products are produced legally in low-tax jurisdictions, but often intended for smuggling.[12] Smuggled and counterfeit cigarettes are dangerous products as they do not live up to the quality control standards imposed on legitimate brand cigarettes. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:58 am
The same day the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Fisher v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
In June Medical v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 8:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 11:17 pm
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:10 am
This is stated in the 2000 Texas Supreme Court case, Crown Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 12:02 pm
[Ed. note: I am counsel for the defendant in the second decision summarized here.]United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
For the purposes of examining individual cases, member states shall not: (a) directly disclose information regarding individual applications for asylum, or the fact that an application has been made, to the alleged actor(s) of persecution of the applicant for asylum; (b) obtain any information from the alleged actor(s) of persecution in a manner that would result in such actor(s) being directly informed of the fact that an application has been made by the applicant in question, and would… [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 4:51 am
Supreme Court decided Diaz v. [read post]
