Search for: "Michael Marks"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 10,761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am
At the Associated Press, Mark Sherman reports that “[t]he action suggests the high court could uphold the latest version of the ban that Trump announced in September. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
While the final programme is yet to be confirmed, it is known that it will include IPKat blogmeister Jeremy Phillips (who is a long-time MARQUES supporter and helped set up Class 46), leading European trade mark counsel Michael Edenborough QC, Professor Spyros Maniatis, French practitioner Jean-Michel Flu, trade mark attorney Richard Ashmead, Appointed Person and solicitor Anna Carboni, Birgit Clark (who needs no introduction to readers of this blog!) [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:32 pm
Michael Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.2008 WL 2278116(N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:13 pm
Mark E. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 11:33 pm
"An autopsy of Diaz noted scorchlike marks that ran nearly the length of his left arm where the potassium chloride was delivered. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am
(ArsTechnica) Global – Trade Marks & Domain Names Wikileaks, reputation risks, and ‘pre-emptive’ actions! [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 8:38 am
Vincent Price (known best to my generation as the voice from Michael Jackson’s Thriller) made his mark in the horror and science fiction world beginning with the Tower of London in 1939. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:13 am
Founder and CEO of Mind Candy, Michael Acton Smith called the ruling a “huge disappointment” and went on to say that he “would have thought that Lady Gaga could have seen the humour behind this parody” Impact of the decision In terms of the trade mark infringement claim, an article in The Guardian points out that this ruling may have an impact on tribute bands or characters that have similar names to original acts. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am
(IPBiz) Australia Patentology Newsbytes – including Uniloc’s Aussie inventor responds to appeal decision in Microsoft case (Patentology) Canada Supreme Court will lead tech law in 2011 (Michael Geist) Apps, Bots and Workarounds – Part 2: Research in Motion Ltd. v Kik Interactive Inc (IPblog) Apps, Bots and Workarounds – Part 3: Fraser Beach v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am
In Bloomberg View, Michael Kinsley argues that Citizens United v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:34 am
Judge Mark Stoltz overturned his conviction for murder because of prosecutorial misconduct at the Frank Crowley Courts Building on Tuesday, October 28, 2014. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:43 pm
" In addition to Udall, Harkin and Merkley, the resolution is currently co-sponsored by the following senators: Dick Durbin (IL), Amy Klobuchar (MN), Sherrod Brown (OH), Mark Begich (AK), Richard Blumenthal (CT), Kirsten Gillibrand (NY), Jeanne Shaheen (NH), Michael Bennet (CO), Barbara Boxer (CA), Benjamin L. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 5:35 am
One of the problems with getting a tattoo is that it's a huge commitment, whether viewed as a permanent mark or just one too painful to remove. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:01 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Michael Robert Rains v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 5:30 am
In the UK, they are worn to mark Armistice Day on November 11, which is the day the Armistice agreement was signed, marking the end of fighting and the start of peace negotiations when it entered into force at 11 a.m. that day. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
Mark O’Brien, cofounder and executive director of Pro Bono Net, is joining Paladin as an advisor. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 4:56 pm
Case Western Law Interim Dean Michael Scharf will moderate. ► Roundtable on the July 1995 “Srebrenica Massacre,” in which upwards of 8,000 Bosniak boys and men perished. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Mark Walsh has a first-hand account of yesterday’s opinion announcements for this blog. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 3:12 pm
Not as creepy as the fixation SEC attorney Jeffrey Norris had with Mark Cuban but creepy just the same. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
” In an op-ed in the New York Times, Michael McConnell argues that the court’s three recent decisions on religious freedom (Espinoza v. [read post]
