Search for: "People v Word" Results 6721 - 6740 of 17,914
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am by Randy Barnett
But in Middle English, the word “deer” meant a beast or animal of any kind. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:56 pm by Randy Barnett
These originalists maintain that the Privileges or Immunities Clause was a free standing provision, the substance of which included both the “Corfield v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:48 am by SHG
Nor was Brennan, although he was both able and influential, as indeed was Stevens—until he wrote a ridiculous opinion in Clinton v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Despite evidence that the post had only been viewed by a small number of people and was shortly removed from the site, the Court held that the words complained of constituted a “serious libel and was not one to be construed as some mere tongue in cheek saloon bar banter” as was submitted by the defendant. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 10:44 am by Marci A. Hamilton
In other words, if a law applies to all who engage in particular conduct, it can apply to all, even if some of those people are religiously motivated. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:22 am
Good thing that there are Courts of Appeal (like the 4th Appellate Court) who found in People v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:38 am by David Post
Scott Applewhite/Associated Press) A few weeks ago, the Supreme Court released its opinion in Packingham v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:15 pm by daniel
[i.e. list past food intake] In other words, program a computer to help people keep track of meals and calorie or vitamin intake. [read post]