Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2010, 9:44 pm
New v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:44 am
This status quo cannot persist if our constitutional order is going to withstand threats to its core principles–such as federalism, the separation of powers, and the sovereignty of the people–arising from modern developments. [read post]
3 May 2021, 4:00 am
Ford decided to give Ontario police forces the power to randomly stop people and motorists and compelled them to answer police questions. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:37 am
U.S., a punt in Zubik v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:21 am
The court issued its rulings this morning.A big win in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 1:37 am
McCormack that the people and not the Senate should make the decision about who should represent them. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm
Commission on Human Rights in a rare display of the city’s little-known power to regulate speech in places of public accommodation. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am
Why, they asked, should unelected Justices be empowered to strike down laws passed by the democratically elected Knesset, which represents the will of the people? [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:46 am
For instance, in Security Alarm Financing v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 4:56 am
Trafford v Blackpool Borough Council [2014] EWHC 85 (Admin) Ms Trafford set up her personal injury practice in Blackpool in 2008. [read post]
21 May 2023, 12:28 pm
Preferably, there will be minimal resort to war powers for expelling freedom-seekers, but (as I wrote), "It is unfortunate that the civil power of the states has been so constricted by judicial error that we have to discuss the military power now as well, and the civil power alone might be sufficient were it not for cases like Arizona v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm
See, e.g., Yelp, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 11:43 am
Rupp v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm
What will happen in the Warman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
Ogden v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
Ogden v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Brown v EMA was a huge step forward for gaming, and will be powerful precedent demanding consideration when regulation is proposed. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:00 pm
In Employment Division v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 1:55 am
Judges are not the only people with the right and the duty to interpret the Constitution. [read post]
