Search for: "R. D. C."
Results 6721 - 6740
of 20,634
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2016, 1:00 am
R v Docherty, 3-4 May 2016. [read post]
22 May 2016, 9:01 pm
The court found that, in soliciting this arrangement, the prosecutor misled the victim of the crime into accepting this resolution of the case and concealed the terms of the gift from the court, both actions violating provisions we now find in the ABA Model Rules, Rules 8.4(c) and (d). [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:00 am
Quant à l’interdiction de conduire, à la lumière de R. c. [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:38 pm
Vitamins A and C will no longer be required to appear on the new nutrition facts label. [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:38 pm
Vitamins A and C will no longer be required to appear on the new nutrition facts label. [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:38 pm
Vitamins A and C will no longer be required to appear on the new nutrition facts label. [read post]
20 May 2016, 12:25 pm
Kennedy: not problematic b/c it does no harm other than exist. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am
And yet it feels yucky: the manipulation isn’t tied to changing your decision from what you’d otherwise make, it’s something else. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
Today, the Supreme Court of California in Winn v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:33 pm
While financial fraud has always been an important enforcement target for the SEC, the agency recently has shown increased attention to financial reporting cases. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:37 pm
Q: we’d be interested if you agree that under current law there is flexibility. [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:11 am
Along with links, here are other articles we hope you will find worth attention: Marquette Law Professor Scott C. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:23 am
We’d love to see an advanced draft of the language in order to comment on drafting choices. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:56 am
Martin, and Steven D. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:43 am
The law has nothing to do with the effectiveness of those systems, especially w/r/t the general public. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:08 am
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EducationLawProfBlog/~4/0JqDAOVv8-c" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]
19 May 2016, 12:21 am
A post from The Landlord Law Blog: This is the wording of the ground: The dwelling-house was occupied (whether alone or with others) by a married couple, a couple who are civil partners of each other, a couple living together as husband and wife or a couple living together as if they were civil partners and— (a) one or both of the partners is a tenant of the dwelling-house, (b) the landlord who is seeking possession is a registered social landlord or a charitable housing trust, (c)… [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:00 am
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was Uber Canada inc. c. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:06 pm
This column — part of the Practical Lawyer series — was authored by Ethan C. [read post]
