Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 6721 - 6740 of 10,141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2008, 9:48 am
The short posts let us name things by topic. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Finally, the doctrinal reason for not having the military commission review these two additional violations is found in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
MORSON, Plaintiff, -against KREINDLER & KREINDLER, LLP, Defendant.09 CV 2994 (DRH)(ARL)UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2011 U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm by Ed Gehres
Bay Mills Indian Community was significantly more supportive of the historical view of tribal sovereignty urged by the tribe and the United States in this case. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Simmonds, the United States Supreme Court recently addressed the timeliness of claims under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 — the provision of the securities laws that permits recovery of certain “short-swing trading” profits. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
Weiler (2009) for their help in preparing this short paper and their future assistance on what will be a much more in depth study of these issues. 1 states. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
The Supreme Court justices in the Youngstown steel seizure case faced the question of the emergency authority of the President of the United States, not of the person of Harry S. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 7:14 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
  Except for the City of Ottawa and one other respondent, the respondents were all non-Ontario parties and resided or carried on business in the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 6:57 am by Thomas Heintzman
  Except for the City of Ottawa and one other respondent, the respondents were all non-Ontario parties and resided or carried on business in the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:00 am by Sarah Grant
Defendants then sought the same relief from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (“D.C. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 8:36 am by Sharon Bradford Franklin
United States, Chief Justice John Roberts called the court’s momentous Fourth Amendment decision “a narrow one. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Big Tent Democrat
Discon, Inc., 525 U.S. 128 (1998), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that: [P]recedent limits the per se rule in the boycott context to cases involving horizontal agreements among direct competitors. [. . .] [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 3:27 am by Orin S. Kerr
  Judge Reeves assumes that whether an officer's physical intrusion into a car is reasonable is governed by a Fifth Circuit case, United States v. [read post]