Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 6721 - 6740 of 10,141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2012, 5:47 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
Donziger – Judge Refuses to Declare Judgment Against Chevron Unenforceable (lesliebrodie.wordpress.com) Filed under: Canada, recognition and enforcement Tagged: Canada, Chevron Corporation, Ecuador, Nueva Loja, Ontario, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Ted Folkman, United States [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 5:41 pm
” Representative Rohrabacher elaborated that China “supports every rogue enemy of the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:19 am by Barry Friedman
  Most important, over the length of his all-too-short career, Bickel changed his views profoundly. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In short, this amounts to striking a middle ground – whaling will be allowed but inevitably the United States will attach strings. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:26 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
As I discussed in a recent post, the United States Supreme Court left many questions unanswered in its two recent decisions on life without parole for juveniles. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 12:39 pm by Michael O'Hear
As I discussed in a recent post, the United States Supreme Court left many questions unanswered in its two recent decisions on life without parole for juveniles. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:00 am by Ernest E. Badway
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit refused to vacate an arbitration award against a securities clearing firm where it had been alleged a fraudulent transfer occurred. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:07 pm
The use of Field Sobriety Tests has become an increasingly regular routine in the United States, as they allow police officers to make roadside determinations of intoxication. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:20 am by Caitlin Stickler, Olswang LLP
  M-Tech acquired these drives from a broker in the United Statesand imported them into theUK. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
” She added that “while defendants’ contention that an investor could not purchase an RDS in the United States without a corresponding overseas transaction may be true, it does not change the fact that a purchase in the United State still took place. [read post]