Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 27,233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 10:42 am
State, 400 S.W.3d 200, 206 (Tex. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
In 2011 LegalZoom stated, “We have served approximately 2 million customers over the last 10 years. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:27 pm
Bottini v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 2:32 pm
In Fudge v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 8:50 am
Code § 8-102. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 7:35 am
Calhoun v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 7:35 am
Calhoun v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 7:34 am
As stated in ACQIS, LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 6:16 am
Repealing step-up in basis would make the tax code more neutral and eliminate a tax expenditure. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 6:08 am
It is styled, Jade Freeman v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 3:55 am
” In the events leading to Williams v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 3:13 am
The Court considered the principle established in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex p Onibiyo [1996] QB 768, that it was for the Secretary of State to decide whether further submissions constituted a fresh claim giving rise to a right of appeal. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 3:22 pm
In Singh v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 2:28 pm
In Lam v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 2:10 pm
Texas Open Meeting Act The Texas Open Meetings Act is found in Chapter 551 of the Government Code. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 9:27 am
District Court for the Northern District of California in Ramos v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 6:49 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 1:15 pm
The EFF does not like the Revised Patent Eligibility Guidance published by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in January 2019 and is charging USPTO Director Andrei Iancu with attempting to subvert the United States Supreme Court and essentially ignore Alice v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:50 am
Code §2744.09 as it is written is in keeping with this Court’s decision in Sampson v. [read post]
