Search for: "State v. David." Results 6721 - 6740 of 13,968
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Is this hypothetical figure somehow evolving, David asks? [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 8:00 pm by David McDonald
To this, the court stated, “… it would be troubling to excuse a party who behaves correctly only when caught. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
On Friday, Zoe Bedell summarized the recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights on extraditions to the United States: Trabelsi v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
” We noticed David Garrow's contribution to a symposium on Roe v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
For example, noted Mennonite theologian John Howard Yoder, noted Pentecostalist theologian David K. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:33 am by Jim Sedor
Colorado – Federal Lawsuit Challenges McCain-Feingold Disclosure Law Legal Newsline – David Yates | Published: 9/4/2014 The Center for Competitive Politics filed two lawsuits on behalf of a Colorado think tank, asserting that similar state and federal campaign finance disclosure laws are unconstitutional. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Supreme Court resolved this landmark case in 1964, New York Times v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:01 pm
 The only thing the states might once have relied upon–the unadorned moral condemnation of homosexuality–has been denied them by Lawrence v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:40 pm by Jason Rantanen
Cir. 2011) (noting that “trade secret law varies little from state to state”). [3] David S. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 1:51 pm
 As David noted here, the brief consisted of a “hodgepodge” of social science claims, including some that were “nonsensical, even given the state of medical knowledge at the time. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]