Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 6721 - 6740 of 16,215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2010, 4:37 pm
Since the statute of limitations is intended to give defendants "the protections of predictability and promptness" (quoting United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Here are some early thoughts about the majority opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 1:45 am by Christopher Knight, 11 KBW.
Indeed, Lord Hope expressly disavows it being a test at all, stating that it is a question of fact for the tribunal. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The court precedent Fisher relies upon to claim medical examiners are public officers (Prieto Bail Bonds v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 3:21 am by Adam Wagner
The court made a strong statement that executive power would not go unchecked, even in matters where the public wanted urgent action. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:22 am by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC
In order to determine whether a peremptory challenge is fair and legitimate, Maryland courts apply a three-step process established by the United States Supreme Court in the Batson v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 7:03 am by Monica Williamson
  The Nez Perce Tribe Law & Order Executive Officer (Manager-V), Lapwai, ID. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 8:34 pm by Administrator
The death penalty was suspended in the United States from 1972 through 1976 primarily as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Furman v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 12:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Part V explains the strong anticompetitive effects of Sunday liquor laws. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
But as I have argued elsewhere Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito have pretty strong originalist tendencies. [1]  Even if these latter justices respect precedent more, they follow originalism in cases of first impression, as in NLRB v. [read post]