Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2021, 9:49 am
Qatar), Switzerland (United Arab Republic v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Microsoft (v. i4i) finagled a Supreme Court review to lower the burden for prior art not considered by the patent examiner during prosecution. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
Amex was sued by the United States and several states, who argued that the anti-steering provisions in its contracts with merchants violate federal antitrust law. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:44 am
”[8] The Louisiana expense attribution provisions outlined above are based on federal tax provisions aimed at preventing United States taxpayers from claiming deductions for amounts incurred to generate income not included in federal taxable income by the United States.[9] There are two Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) provisions on which the Louisiana law is based: Section 265, which addresses the treatment of interest expense… [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:53 pm
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:49 am
United States, 16-9604 Issue: Whether Missouri’s second-degree burglary statute is divisible into two offenses with separate elements for the purpose of analyzing whether a conviction under that statute qualifies as a conviction for a “violent felony” as defined in the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
The IP captioning requirements apply only to programming that has been “published or exhibited on television in the United States”. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm
United States—is subject to two exceptions. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm
The best case in support of a due process right for a provider to challenge an assistance order is In re Application of the United States of America, 610 F.2d 1148 (3d Cir. 1979). [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Maryland v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:29 am
Bush,…has no power to order the release of prisoners held by the Executive for seven years, where the Executive detention is indefinite and without authorization in law, and release into the continental United States is the only possible effective remedy. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 3:16 pm
Cos. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 7:38 am
Two amicus briefs also bear mention – the United States in support of the employees and the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:14 am
In previous gay rights decisions, such as United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:32 am
Three merely note that the United States “adopted the SHA-1 has algorithm . . . as a Federal Information SMWgo2 Processing Standard. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:07 am
SOURCE: United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 4:44 pm
Granston stressed that in declined cases, the government is a “third party” as described in United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
’Murphy v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:50 am
Franita Tolson – In NAMUDNO v. [read post]
