Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 16,271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2015, 3:44 am
Court of Appeals for the 3d Circuit 2005).Makwana v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:13 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:30 pm
The Eleventh Circuit in Weber v Finker ruled that a Swiss national can use 28 USC 1782, and is not limited to the Swiss-US mutual legal assistance treaty, for purposes of obtaining evidence in Swiss proceedings, which include a Swiss criminal proceeding. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 3:10 pm
” United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:51 am
Joining the Second Circuit, which recently came to the same conclusion, see United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:00 am
Sanchez v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 11:56 am
Circuit Judges Mary M. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 5:20 am
Circuit’s decision in United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 3:50 pm
United Farm Workers Nat'l Union, 442 U.S. 289, 298 (1979) (quoting Railway Mail Assn. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:42 pm
United States Bankruptcy Judge Bill Parker of the Eastern District of Texas issued JUDGMENT against a creditor in one of our adversary proceedings finding that posting a sign concerning the pre-petition debt owed by the Debtor constituted a willful violation of the stay. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 10:02 am
Last month, the Sixth Circuit issued an important Fourth Amendment decision regarding searches of electronic devices, United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:44 am
by Dennis Crouch Google recently petitioned for en banc review a Federal Circuit split decision in EcoFactor v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm
His estate sues the several prison employees under Bivens and the United States via the FTCA. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 3:25 am
Baude, et al. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:14 pm
(Orin Kerr) “Yes,” says Judge Maurice Paul in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:59 pm
(The case is U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Evansand United States v. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:56 pm
Probably United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
