Search for: "Doctor v. State"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 8,651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2013, 7:19 am
Cacchillo v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am
So your doctor (20+ years later when these diseases manifest themselves) would X-ray you and tell you what form of the disease you had. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:47 pm
Paul V. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:31 am
In Thomasson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:45 pm
The question came to the court in a case filed by a transgender patient, Evan Minton, who wanted a hysterectomy and alleges that the hospital, Mercy San Juan Medical Center in Carmichael, California, refused to allow the doctor to perform it, in violation of state civil rights laws. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 12:18 pm
The Florida Supreme Court has held that the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Porter v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:59 am
State Farm Ins. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:11 am
The current state of play, as I understand it, is (1) as to amputees a doctor who performed the surgery might very well lose his license or at least be subject to significant critcism from bioethicists, and the state certainly would not pay for it or allow a tax deduction. (2) As to the trans person in distress, there are many doctors who would perform the surgery and it is generally accepted by medical ethics. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
-Dickinson Law 2.00 $96,321 $48,200 Pennsylvania State Univ. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Srivastava, No. 074386 Order suppressing evidence seized by federal officers from residence and medical offices of doctor-plaintiff is vacated and remanded where: 1) the evidence suppressed was constitutionally seized and within the scope of the search warrants; and 2) the court's blanket suppression of all seized evidence was erroneous. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
State, No. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 9:53 am
Bank v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:37 am
Mgmt., LLC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:10 am
(Scott v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:57 pm
” Snow v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am
Additional Resources: Ridley v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 10:36 am
Harris v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:09 am
” Glaxo, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm
Kelly, 42 Ohio App. 3d 184 (1987). [4] Freels v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 5:37 pm
B.B. v. [read post]
