Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 9,560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 10:03 pm
For example, the city manager represented to HUD that the City had approved the sale of the property and would commit up to $1 million in financial aid. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:52 pm
This case may have been filed 120 days ago, but we heard the parties’ oral arguments only 35 days ago. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:09 am
Solutions Co., 100 F.3d 828, 833-35 (10th Cir. 1996)). [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 7:27 pm
Mary's L.J. 35 (2023). [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
” While children’s attorneys are expected to participate fully in proceedings in which they are appointed their participation is limited to matters in which the children are the “subject of the proceeding” (Family Court Act § 249; see Judiciary Law § 35[7]). [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:58 pm
" The applicable standard of the Eighth Circuit, in which this case arose, does not differ. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:25 pm
In addition to awarding attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:06 am
Chapter 1 Intellectual Property Chapter 1 uses 36 provisions to set out rules aiming at strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs) and enforcement. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[35] Some courts rely exclusively on the language of the letter of intent (the “literal” approach), while other courts are willing to look beyond the language and consider the entire transaction, including the surrounding circumstances of the negotiations (the “comprehensive” approach).[36] The literal and comprehensive approaches are discussed below. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:34 am
To decide whether § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) is unconstitutionally overbroad or vague on its face, this Court does not have to consider exactly how the line between solicitation and abstract advocacy will be drawn. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 12:08 am
November 1. [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
” What does this mean? [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 10:09 am
Wednesday, November 25, 2020, at 1:00 p.m.: Lawfare Live will host a conversation with the editors. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 2:39 pm
To which employers does the FFCRA apply to? [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 5:24 pm
Peirce does not rely on these more directly obvious lines of response to the emerging stakeholder model (itself the subject of the sort of distortion that has been the fate of Friedman's perspective but from the other side). [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Marshall did not at any time hold a license within the meaning of S. 4(1)(a) of the Maritime Provinces Fishery regulations and S. 35(2) of the Fishery Act with respect to fishing for or selling eels from Pomquet Harbour. *** The eel fishing case, which began in Nova Scotia Provincial Court on October 17, 1994, was public, expensive, and lengthy. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
II, § 1, cl. 8. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
By Thomas A. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Therefore, if this Court believes that plaintiff has proved her case on the merits (a matter on which this brief does not opine), this Court should vacate the injunction and remand for the entry of an injunction crafted as described above. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
These crimes come with the harshest penalties under the law, ranging from a presumptive minimum of 13 years in prison to a presumptive maximum of 35 years. [read post]
