Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 7,214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2008, 10:45 am
So it was perfectly acceptable--i.e., unlike the case with Bush v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 4:07 pm
Since the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision in Richardson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:00 am
The House of Lords in Erven Warnink v Townend provided a remedy of extended passing-off in order to prevent the defendant selling as "Old English Advocaat" a drink that may have been English but which was neither old nor advocaat. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 5:03 pm
" McCulloch v. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 12:21 am
., v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:02 am
By failing to produce the AG's Opinion in English, it is withheld not only from the English and Irish contingent, but from nationals (and courts) in many other states who can read decisions in English but cannot read them in (say) Latvian.The failure of the court to produce an English translation, or a French translation, of a critical opinion is ludicrous. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 12:13 pm
Commission shows just how sensitive and litigious the member States are about languages. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:21 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 1:55 pm
Stuart v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:27 am
The High Court decision in Alberta v Katanga dealt with two separate questions that are of interest. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
In this piece I will discuss how if at all this provision has been altered by the case of Proctor and Gamble v Office for Harmonisation In the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) ; Known simply as "Baby Dry"; and subsequent cases. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 12:54 pm
The judges' hands were "somewhat tied" by Nichia v Argos (noted by the IPKat here) which, he considered, removed the judges' ability to apply mandatory procedural controls, such as those proposed in the Burdon Plan. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Aug. 7, 1990); In re English Seafood (USA) Inc., 743 F.Supp. 281, 286-89 (D.Del.1990) (holding that the court has subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's claim for corporate dissolution, but that the court should abstain from exercising it); Codos v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:09 pm
She is of Somali origin and has a poor understanding of English. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:13 pm
In mid-March, the Court granted certiorari in Negusie v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 1:58 pm
That was for the specific reason that one of the important Indian cases on the point - State of UP v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:41 am
It contained an arbitration clause which stated that, in the event of disagreement or dispute, the parties should appoint an arbitrator in Paris. [read post]
