Search for: "Good v. State"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 44,387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2012, 6:48 am
The FDA Public Affairs director, Erica V. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:57 am
In particular, the court considered that: “If a state contracts for its goods to be carried by sea, a classic example of a commercial contract, there is no reason, pursuant to the restrictive theory of state immunity, why it should not be exposed to the same liability in salvage as a private owner of goods”. [read post]
10 May 2021, 9:20 am
All rise for the CC...Justice Brandeis’s concurrence in Ashwander v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:20 am
This generally means the debtor (at least in Michigan, and the practice does vary a bit from state to state, country to country) is handed the document. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:37 pm
Pressed by Marty to explain how ICANN can distinguish between good applicants and bad ones, Mary pointed out that all applicants were examined -- the problem of choice runs between competing good applicants as well as good v bad ones -- and expressed the hope that competing applicants would reach a negotiated understanding. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
So far, so good. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:58 pm
Likewise, the right of parents to control the education and upbringing of their children is fundamental under Pierce v Society of Sisters and Meyer v Nebraska, yet states have enormous latitude in requiring parents to send their kids to school, vaccinate their kids, and so forth. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:36 am
State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:33 am
In Teague v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm
The Court could not make an award of “vindicatory” damages, merely to mark the commission of the wrong; this was wrong in principle: see R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] 1 AC 245 [97-100]. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:10 am
This is Part 2 of a post discussing the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:04 am
”* Ruggiero’s application for benefits stated that she lost her employment due to a lack of work which, in view of her employer’s assurance of her of continued employment, the court characterized as a “willful misrepresentation to obtain benefits. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 7:57 pm
’ Therefore, Dastar controls, and Gee-Gee fails to state a claim under the Lanham Act. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:43 am
Baker v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:30 am
You can find the court's opinion in State Farm v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:33 am
It is a preview of a longer version of the paper forthcoming in the UC Davis Law Review in the spring, published now because of its relevance to New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 4:23 pm
The case of State v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:21 am
In State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 3:31 am
Charles O'Hara won in State v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 11:58 am
In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
