Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 6741 - 6760 of 16,491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 8:37 am by Brian Wolfman
And just as the voters had hoped, the program accomplishes its mission of restoring integrity to the political system. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:25 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
But the system has been problematic in many ways, and it hasn’t worked out the way framers hoped. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 12:04 pm by Larry Reibstein
” If the next election comes down to one state, he says, “we are not in a situation right now where we could stand a Bush v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm by Galen Sherwin, Women's Rights Project
Over six years later, they are still awaiting justice (although they just received a preliminary green light for the case, Sabbithi v. al-Saleh, to proceed, after a protracted court battle over immunity). [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:41 am by Adam Wagner
PM, R (on the application of) v Hertfordshire County Council [2010] EWHC 2056 (Admin) (04 August 2010) – Read judgment Some people get to a certain age and stop counting. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:21 pm
We hope that Maryland and other states join West Virginia in rising above that level.Earlier coverage of the Maryland commission is here. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 11:30 am
How about torture known terrorists if they know details about future terrorist attacks in the United States? [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:00 pm by David Kopel
The Supreme Court’s 1939 decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:19 pm
Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit, based in Boston, ruled on June 9 in Cook v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
In the balance of today's essay, I'll discuss a hypothesis first floated by Professor Stephen Vladeck and reported by the NY Times last month: perhaps the Biden administration is hoping that once the mandate expires of its own force (as it will tomorrow), the case will be moot; then, invoking the Munsingwear mootness doctrine (named for the 1950 SCOTUS case of United States v. [read post]