Search for: "HOWE v. STATE"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 80,975
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2023, 5:17 am
But this court is obliged to follow the Third Department’s recent precedent in Carr, which teaches that “a court resolving a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim cannot base the determination upon submissions by the defendant,” no matter “how compelling claims made in such submissions may appear” (182 AD3d at 668-669). [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:55 am
We are not imagining what obstacles lie ahead if we were to “codify Roe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
In the substance of their chapter, Kaye and Freedman are explicit about how intervals are constructed, and that: “the confidence level does not give the probability that the unknown parameter lies within the confidence interval. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
United States) and the other (Bolling v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
It considers how the state immunity revolution came to an end, continuing threats to the Seminole Tribe paradigm posed by recent decisions like Torres v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
For example, some state officials banned the consideration of social or political interests when making investment decisions for state pension funds or have redirected state funds away from large asset managers because these officials claim the companies are prioritising political and social agendas over duties to clients. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Melling pointed to cases such as Fulton v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 3:21 pm
United States, a recent decision from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, is a good example of how this can go sideways. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 2:36 pm
See, e.g., Danbeck v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 11:11 am
See, e.g., Raymond v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 11:11 am
See, e.g., Raymond v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 10:18 am
[3] United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 8:13 am
Evid. 304(d)(1), 404(b), 705; United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
There was nothing wrong with Dr Cooper reusing text that he had written for another purpose previously, but Meade J considered it unfortunate that he did not acknowledge how the overall exercise was done, and that he had been so intimately connected with Orope’s case being developed. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
According to the SEC, the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the law firm has not identified a case or controversy and it does not have standing or a ripe dispute (Hodl Law, PLLC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:36 am
The Fifth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 11:47 pm
But in Biden v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 8:16 pm
See also Dred Scott v. [read post]
