Search for: "High v State" Results 6741 - 6760 of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 3:42 pm by familoo
The principles set out in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] A.C. 22 were stated to apply to all jurisdictions and the principles of legal personality had to be respected. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:26 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Neuberger stated that the conclusion of the Court of Appeal in Ellis v Rowbotham [1900] 1 QB 740 that the 1870 Act did not apply to rent payable in advance, is correct. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 6:56 pm by Jason Greis
Responsibility for care also is a common law duty, as courts since Darling v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 3:04 am by Walter Olson
” Two views of the recent case Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Plascencia-Orozco, Ninth Circuit] Central California: “State and federal legislation take new aim at predatory ADA lawsuits” [Garth Stapley, Modesto Bee] Tags: ADA filing mills, Article V, California, law schools, Maryland, politics, Senate, South Carolina, South Dakota April 19 roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 2:57 am by Walter Olson
Tam, feds drop effort to void trademark of Washington Redskins [Ilya Shapiro, Eugene Volokh, earlier] Tags: Article V, constitutional law, double jeopardy, football, rule of law Constitutional law roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 2:26 am by Peter Groves
In the introduction to his opinion, he comments critically on the state of thelaw. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:35 am
You may have noticed that one of the key issues in yesterday's global warming decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:04 am by nyinjuries
Contrary to the defendant¹s contention, as stated by the Court of Appeals, ³[t]here is no requirement in Nallan [Nallan v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm by A
On Nov. 3, the 2nd Court ruled in Kathryn and Jeremy Medlen v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may not be… [read post]