Search for: "IN RE GUESS"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 16,480
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2013, 7:49 am
Sometimes the responding officer will take his or her best guess as to what happened and issue a ticket. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 10:35 am
750,000 documents is a lot—my guess is they’re pulling in random orders and rulings that are part of the public record but not especially useful in legal research.Another thing: opinions in the FDSys collection are slip opinions. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:47 am
There are legitimate uses for divulging personal data, such as life insurers who need to know about the people whose lives they’re underwriting. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:30 am
” OK, you’re interested right, but you want to hear more? [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:01 pm
Since his post is appearing here, you can guess the results. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:44 pm
I find it staggering that we’re even here having this conversation. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
That said, I would guess that the court’s instinct was along the lines of “if a competitor is intentionally impersonating a brand online and possibly diverting customers, federal law has to provide some hook”. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
Until then, we can only guess at what’s going on. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 6:19 am
I can't tell from the CNN report what happens where both parents were only children, but I'm guessing the rule is a maximum of 2 children, and that rule applies if either or both parents were only children.And, for what it's worth: China announces it's abolishing labor camps. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 12:51 pm
If you don’t like social media, guess what? [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Ct. 2567 (2011), so we’re not going over that again. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
In re Sounds Good Broadcast Consultants, Inc., Serial No. 77885449 (October 29, 2013) [not precedential].The Board found the genus of services to be identified by applicant’s recitation of services. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Looking back, I had the following responses: Ignore it (about 60% of the time) Skim it and hope something jumps out at me (10%) Read through it in detail (10%) Look for some element that doesn’t feel right and question the project manager about it (20%) Admittedly, I’m guessing on the percentages, but they’re in the ballpark. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I thought I’d pass along two briefs that the UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic has filed in the last few weeks. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:51 pm
This is designed to tell them, ‘Guess what — you’d better worry. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 6:15 pm
The per curiam Court relies on authority that holds a sentence becomes “unbundled” on remand and re-sentencing – ergo, there’s no presumption of vindictiveness when the reversal of a two-year min-mand produces an identical prison (re)sentence. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 7:20 am
You’re voting against yourself thrice. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:00 pm
The retrial will be complicated enough without it.Finally, here's the order: 13-11-07 Order Re. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 1:31 pm
I’m going to guess those are ruined for the defendants in this case. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 7:18 am
You’ll just have to settle for our summary.We’re not starting at the beginning. [read post]
