Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 6741 - 6760
of 42,101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2021, 8:53 am
PLEASE NOTE: Willing to consider Rule 39(C) Applicants. [read post]
7 May 2021, 8:29 am
They don't see police much and most of their thinking on this is based more on ideological and partisan predilections than a hard-nosed assessment of self interest. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:09 pm
Notwithstanding the defendant’s release, the Court addressed the merits of the petition pursuant to the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:27 am
The appellant added that the public interest was unaffected by their ulterior motive for the mark. [read post]
6 May 2021, 6:00 am
Head; Amy C. [read post]
5 May 2021, 12:16 pm
Rebenlin, prostat Guelferbyti apud C. [read post]
5 May 2021, 11:04 am
Since numerous judgments and opinions were delivered at the Court of Justice at the end of April, we are only now reporting on the present cases, which are by no means less interesting than those previously covered. [read post]
5 May 2021, 5:21 am
within each room or section resolve by going to the weighting of interests, values and rights in presence, [read post]
5 May 2021, 4:00 am
The most-consulted French-language decision was 4240073 Canada inc. c. [read post]
4 May 2021, 7:29 pm
Ohio) -- determining that: (1) DEA performed adequate search for records organized under “Operation Speakeasy”; and (2) DEA could not rely on Exemption 7(C) to categorically withhold investigatory records pertaining to third party, because privacy interest interest was outweighed by public interest—namely shedding light on DOJ’s decision not to prosecute the highest elected law enforcement official in a Kentucky county for obstruction of… [read post]
4 May 2021, 3:42 pm
So in my judgment, for whatever that’s worth, the proper response to the second question is minimal—either to kick the matter back to Facebook for the development or rules or to say something broad and general like this: Suspensions of political leaders should be undertaken with great care and only after due deliberations and should depend on (a) the clarity of the violation, (b) the seriousness of the violation, (c) the harms caused by or potential harms threated by the… [read post]
4 May 2021, 1:03 pm
Section 46(1)(c)(i), LAO’s board may make a rule determining how it will pay “service providers”, which include community legal clinics, “including by the payment of hourly rates or block fees or by the provision of funding for a specified period of time”. [read post]
4 May 2021, 9:33 am
Second, C.D. had approached Rapp—through a mutual friend—to see whether Rapp would be interested in bringing a civil suit against Spacey. [read post]
4 May 2021, 6:06 am
But the problems with Bill C-10 don’t end there. [read post]
4 May 2021, 1:42 am
(a) Is it generally the case that an infringer that remains silent on a notice of infringement for several months thereby indicates that it is not interested in obtaining a licence, such that – despite the existence of a licence request expressed orally – there is no such request, with the consequence that the SEP holder’s action for a prohibitory injunction must be allowed? [read post]
3 May 2021, 5:47 pm
Click here to read about the new National Interest Exceptions. [read post]
3 May 2021, 4:43 pm
The first option, known as the National Interest Exception (NIE), is available to visa applicants who can demonstrate that their entry to the United States is necessary because it is in the National Interest. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:40 am
C. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:35 am
As a result of such amalgamation, among other things, the common shares of the Company held by Holdco were cancelled and the common shares of Holdco held by the Principal Shareholders were converted into multiple voting shares of the Company (“Multiple Voting Shares”) in proportion to their respective interests in Holdco. [read post]
3 May 2021, 7:35 am
Over the weekend, your correspondent put together an update on the status of all the various bills that make up the Texas George Floyd Act for the 65-group coalition promoting them, so let's re-post it here for Grits readers who may be interested. [read post]
