Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 6741 - 6760 of 6,908
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2007, 3:51 am
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0215p.06  2007/06/11 USA v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:20 pm
Scott Nelson has this post at the Consumer Law & Policy Blog about the Court's unanimous decision in Watson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 12:30 pm
(I must have missed that day in law school.) [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 1:52 pm
Holowecki, which "will answer the question of what constitutes a 'charge' for purposes of employment discrimination law" left open by Edelman v. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 5:58 am
For the reasons discussed below, we AFFIRM in part and REVERSE in part. 07a0199p.06 2007/05/31 USA v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:20 pm
Ross Runkel discusses today's opinion here at Law Memo. [read post]
26 May 2007, 11:40 am
En los EE.UU., cuando hay N.N. en un caso -un litigante del que, por cuestiones de privacidad, minoridad o decoro, se mantiene su nombre en reserva- las causas se tramitan con estos seudónimos.Se usa el "Doe" si el sujeto es demandado o acusado, y el "Roe" si es actor (de ahí el famoso caso sobre aborto, "Roe v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
This week saw the ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Experience Hendrix LLC v Purple Haze Records Ltd and others [2007] EWCA Civ 501, a decision of Lords Justices Keene, Jacob and Toulson on Thursday 24 May 2007.Musical megastar Jimi Hendrix (left), a US citizen, gave performances between 1967 and his death in 1970 in (among other places) the UK, Sweden and the USA. [read post]
23 May 2007, 3:41 pm
To the extent that this case combines Agency law with director/officer liability under the direct participation theory (e.g., Saltiel v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 5:52 pm
I thought CL&P blog readers might find interesting the recent opinion in a North Carolina state court class action, Moody v. [read post]