Search for: "Little v State"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 26,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
The recent district court opinion in CFTC V. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 12:05 pm
Archer & White Sales Inc. and Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:58 am
Delaware Representative Michael Ramone (R) for sponsoring successful legislation to repeal the state’s short-lived estate tax, which had raised little revenue and was widely seen as driving wealthy retirees out of state. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:14 am
Because of the state action doctrine, they are generally assumed to be unconstrained by the First Amendment. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:50 am
That should become clearer after the outcome of Liberty’s appeal to the Court of Appeal in its judicial review of the Act and various pending references to the CJEU.Meanwhile the recent Strasbourg judgment in Big Brother Watch v UK (yet to be made final, pending possible referral to the Grand Chamber) has exposed a separate set of flaws in the IP Act’s predecessor legislation, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA). [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:15 am
Adams was the father of early state constitutions. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 3:49 pm
Cottrill v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 11:44 am
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 6:12 am
New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 3:12 pm
Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. (1959); United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 12:25 pm
If there is a history it will displayed at the bottom of the page as what is called a Short Caption that says Comm. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
I am happy to report the publication of Cuba’s Caribbean Marxism: Essays on Ideology, Government, Society, and Economy in the Post Fidel Castro Era (Little Sir Press 2018; ISBN: 978-1-949943-00-9 (pbk); I SBN: 978-1-949943-01-6 (ebk)). [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 10:16 am
Boxer, supra, 156 Cal.App.3d 171 and Little v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 10:16 am
Boxer, supra, 156 Cal.App.3d 171 and Little v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:00 am
Most notably, in Kaplan v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:03 am
State Department provided a detailed rebuttal in 2017. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:35 am
But Member States do not enjoy them: the rationale of fundamental rights is to protect individuals from the State, not vice versa: "If the State were able to invoke its individual rights, other than the public interest, in order to limit fundamental rights, the result would be the destruction of those fundamental rights. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
First, a little history and background and then a more extensive analysis. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 11:50 am
One area of ambiguity in states’ laws, however, derives from the fact that many states’ policies are predicated on viability of the fetus and yet there is little consensus on when a fetus is actually viable. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:20 am
Last week, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in State of California v. [read post]
